Issue Highlights
Issue period
|
11/12/12-14/12/12
|
Issue Size
|
Rs. 45.33 billion/
18,89,00,000 equity shares
|
Price Band
|
Rs. 210-240
|
Face value
|
Rs. 10
|
Lot Size
|
50
|
Maximum Retail
Subscription Amount
|
Rs. 1,92,000 or 16
lots
|
Industry
|
Telecom Towers &
Infrastructure
|
Registrar
|
Karvy Computershare
|
Issue Type
|
100 % Book Building
|
Listing
|
BSE,NSE
|
Retail Discount
|
Rs. 10
|
Issue Details
Issue
|
Fresh Issue
|
Offer for Sale
|
18,89,00,000 shares
|
14,62,34,112 shares
|
4,26,65,888 shares
|
Industry Profile
The revenue
of the Indian telecom & towers industry is in excess of Rs. 1361billion
with mobile subscriber base of around 919 million out of which around 868
million are 2G subscribers and approximately 51 million are 3G subscribers.
Urban mobile penetration has reached around 163 % while rural penetration
remains a meager 38.3 %.Though, Indian telecom industry is very competitive
globally with over 10 operators but the top 3 players account for the 68 % of
the market share.
In a period
spanning 2005-2010, Indian wireless industry has grown at a CAGR of 56 % with
the surge in subscriber base being attributed to a sharp decline in tariffs and
the expansion of services by existing players.
Company Profile
Bharti Infratel
Ltd. (BIL) is one of the largest tower and related infrastructure provider
company in India (on a consolidated basis considering its stake in Indus).In
India BIL has over 34,000 towers across 18 states and 11 telecom circles.
Indus: Indus is a joint venture between Bharti
Infratel, Vodafone India and Aditya Birla Telecom with holding equity interests
of 42 %, 42% and 16 % respectively.
Objects of the Issue
·
For
the funding of installation of 4813 new towers : Rs. 1087 crore
·
up
gradation & replacement work of existing towers : Rs. 1214 crore
·
For
taking green initiatives at tower sites: Rs. 639 crore
·
General
corporate purposes: NA
Strengths & Opportunities
·
With
the sprawling 3G/4G user base in future,
the need for newer towers shall increase significantly
·
As
3G spectrum operates on a higher frequency band , its reach being limited, the
demand for new towers will increase considerably
·
Considering
BIL’s interest in Indus, BIL has economic interest in around 80,656 towers in
India.
·
BIL
and Indus have got 1255 and 975 solar powered sites respectively under their environmental
friendly initiatives.
·
BIL
has long term MSA (Master Service Agreement) with tenant telecom companies.
Under MSA, tenant-telecom
companies use towers (and related infrastructure) provided by BIL and installs
their equipment on it. This is termed as tenancy.
Concerns
·
This
business is prone to litigations arising on the issues like nuisance,
pollution, health hazards, land disputes ,power theft etc
·
Demand
for the tower infrastructure (building, acquiring, owning and operating towers
and related infrastructure) may decrease due to factors such as slump in the
overall economy, reduced capital expenditure by Wireless Telecom Operators due
to various reasons like lesser demand, higher network sharing among operators,
cutting edge technology leading into efficient network requiring lesser towers,
unfavorable government policies, scarcity of power, slow growth of 3G/4G
infrastructure etc.
·
Wireless
telecom operators may opt for enhancing their existing towers to embrace the
3G/4G technology instead of going for newer towers
·
The
cancellation of 2G licenses of telecom operators at the discretion of the Supreme
Court resulted in the closure of around 2.25% of the total co-allocations (tenancy)
and a substantial part of the termination fee was lost besides resulting in a
lower demand for newer towers.
·
BSNL
and MTNL have their own tower portfolios and are contemplating to share their
towers with telecom operators. Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices
ltd. have hived off their towers businesses into separate tower companies which
will be imparting strong competition in
the future
·
Besides
smaller players like GTL infra etc, state
power player like Power Grid Corporation is also desirous of letting its
infrastructure to telecom operators who shall be equipping telecom equipments
on their towers
·
Retrospective
tax law changes (similar to Vodafone vs. GOI case) are negative for the
company’s growth prospects
·
A
few of the group companies incurred losses in the past 3 years
·
Tower
infrastructure business is highly capital intensive and cash flow from
operations will be insufficient to repay the debt and accumulated interest
Financial Profile #
# post issue
equity used for the calculation of the EPS
#
Calculations at the upper price band of Rs. 240
|
FY 13 Annualized
|
FY 12
|
P/E
|
49.2
|
60.4
|
P/B
|
3.2
|
3.1
|
PEG
|
.73
|
1.06
|
Profit CAGR (3 year)
|
67 %
|
57%
|
NPM
|
9%
|
8%
|
M-Cap/ Sales
|
4.6
|
4.8
|
Net Asset per
share
|
Rs. 76
|
Rs. 77
|
EV/EBITDA **
|
13
|
12.3
|
ROE
|
6.4 %
|
5.2 %
|
EPS
|
Rs. 4.9
|
Rs. 4
|
Debt Equity Ratio
|
.65
|
.8
|
Current Ratio
|
1.14
|
1.21
|
** A rough
estimate
Comparison to Peers
No Indian listed
peer company is available for the comparison
Inference
At the
upper price band of Rs. 240, shares will be trading at a FY 13 price-to-earnings
multiple of 49 appearing as a highly priced issue but a high profit CAGR
brings the PEG ratio below 1.(4-year CAGR being too high was
categorically avoided while analyzing the financials)
Bharti Infratel
is not a high leveraged company with a comprehensive debt-to-equity ratio of .65
and this is why it has seen a low ROE of 6.4 %.EV/EBITDA ratio is in a range of
12-13.
Both Price-to-earnings
multiple and EV/EBITDA ratio defines this issue as an overpriced one despite having
a very high profit CAGR growth.
Though in
future returns on equity and capital will increase with rising tenancy
income but aforementioned concerns like government policies, competition from
peer companies especially PSU companies (BSNL, MTNL and Power Grid) is spooking
enough.
It seems, there
is nothing left on the table for investors and listing gains shall depend on
the then prevailing market sentiment and frenzy. Besides, issue being a large
one, a bout of profit booking can be easily seen on and after the listing day.
Risk-averse
value investors better skip this issue. Even long term investor should down
size their buying so that they could cost-average in case shares fall below the
issue price.
BIL is a long term bet because -
Share shall
fundamentally perform well only when BIL gets its ROE increased and for that company
should have a higher growth in tenancy income and will gave to adapt to a
judiciously calibrated higher leverage. This hypothesis makes BIL a long term
bet that too after successfully overcoming the aforementioned concerns.
Disclaimer
Analysis is for the information purpose only. Though due care and caution have been taken while preparing this report, analyst shall not be responsible for any error and shall not bear any financial liability to the users of this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment